Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles's avatar

I once attended a talk by the stress physiology researcher Monika Fleshner in which she defined robustness in a way I really liked. She defined a robust system as one that exhibits both resistance and resilience: resistance being the ability to oppose change from a normal (e.g., homeostatic) range and resilience being the ability to return to that range when indeed perturbed, without undue damage. What I particularly liked about this definition was that it acknowledged that neither being overly flexible nor overly rigid were desirable. It also anchored resilience in a way I find more appropriate than how the word is frequently bandied about.

I take it this definition of robustness resonates with what you're describing. But I'm curious whether you view its underlying qualities similarly or different. In any case, I appreciate the reminder that "building" toward what you want is a better and more sustainable strategy than avoiding what you don't.

Expand full comment
Russell Bentley's avatar

Typos at the end there, love the article and want to share with my athletes, but some lines seem unfinished...

"Health is marked by the ability to"

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts